<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Openscore VPN · Notebook</title>
    <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news</link>
    <description>VPN guides, news, and methodology notes covering no-logs claims, jurisdiction, evidence-based rankings, and cited research.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 02:11:45 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <copyright>© 2026 Openscore VPN. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <atom:link href="https://vpntestor.com/en/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <generator>Openscore VPN</generator>
    <item>
      <title>2026 SingLinkVPN Third-Party Security Audit Report: Cross-Platform Security Tests Passed with a Score of 100/100</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/singlink-vpn-v25-security-audit-2026</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/singlink-vpn-v25-security-audit-2026</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>VPNTestor Platform</dc:creator>
      <description>VPNTestor Platform&apos;s complete July 2026 third-party security audit report covering SingLinkVPN clients, leak protection, access controls, remediation, scoring, and limitations.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VPNTestor Platform&apos;s complete July 2026 third-party security audit report covering SingLinkVPN clients, leak protection, access controls, remediation, scoring, and limitations.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/singlink-vpn-v25-security-audit-2026">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>SingLink VPN</category>
      <category>security assessment</category>
      <category>VPN leak testing</category>
      <category>v2.5</category>
      <category>2026</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>VPN Audit Transparency Index 2026</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/vpn-audit-transparency-index-2026</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/vpn-audit-transparency-index-2026</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>VPNTestor Platform</dc:creator>
      <description>A source-linked index of the VPN audits currently recorded by VPNTestor Platform. It separates a public report from a provider summary, records scope and tested version, and states what the evidence cannot establish.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A source-linked index of the VPN audits currently recorded by VPNTestor Platform. It separates a public report from a provider summary, records scope and tested version, and states what the evidence cannot establish.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/vpn-audit-transparency-index-2026">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>VPN audits</category>
      <category>audit transparency</category>
      <category>security reports</category>
      <category>primary sources</category>
      <category>2026</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SingLink VPN: what an external security audit can, and cannot, verify</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/singlink-vpn-security-audit</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/singlink-vpn-security-audit</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>We ran the parts of a professional VPN security audit that can be done from the outside on SingLink VPN: transport-layer configuration, the App Store record, and the protocol, transparency, logging and jurisdiction posture read from its own documents. The transport layer is modern. The security-critical core, the protocol and the independent-audit trail, is either unverifiable by design or absent. Here is exactly what checks out, what does not, and what no outsider can confirm.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We ran the parts of a professional VPN security audit that can be done from the outside on SingLink VPN: transport-layer configuration, the App Store record, and the protocol, transparency, logging and jurisdiction posture read from its own documents. The transport layer is modern. The security-critical core, the protocol and the independent-audit trail, is either unverifiable by design or absent. Here is exactly what checks out, what does not, and what no outsider can confirm.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/singlink-vpn-security-audit">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>security-audit</category>
      <category>singlink</category>
      <category>tls</category>
      <category>protocols</category>
      <category>transparency</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open-source VPN protocols, compared: what still works in China and Russia</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/open-source-vpn-protocols-china-russia</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/open-source-vpn-protocols-china-russia</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>A technical tour of the open-source protocols behind modern VPNs (WireGuard, OpenVPN, IPsec/IKEv2, OpenConnect, SoftEther) and the circumvention layer built on top of them (Shadowsocks-2022, VLESS+REALITY, Trojan, Hysteria2, TUIC, NaiveProxy): how they differ, which is genuinely faster or safer, and, with dated and cited sources, how each holds up against China&apos;s Great Firewall and Russia&apos;s TSPU as of mid-2026.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A technical tour of the open-source protocols behind modern VPNs (WireGuard, OpenVPN, IPsec/IKEv2, OpenConnect, SoftEther) and the circumvention layer built on top of them (Shadowsocks-2022, VLESS+REALITY, Trojan, Hysteria2, TUIC, NaiveProxy): how they differ, which is genuinely faster or safer, and, with dated and cited sources, how each holds up against China&apos;s Great Firewall and Russia&apos;s TSPU as of mid-2026.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/open-source-vpn-protocols-china-russia">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>protocols</category>
      <category>wireguard</category>
      <category>openvpn</category>
      <category>shadowsocks</category>
      <category>reality</category>
      <category>censorship</category>
      <category>china</category>
      <category>russia</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why a VPN&apos;s jurisdiction matters more than its marketing</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/why-vpn-jurisdiction-matters</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/why-vpn-jurisdiction-matters</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>“Based in a privacy-friendly country” is a line on almost every VPN&apos;s homepage. Jurisdiction is real and worth understanding, but the marketing version glosses over the parts that actually decide whether it protects you. A short, honest guide to what a VPN&apos;s country of registration does and doesn&apos;t buy you.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Based in a privacy-friendly country” is a line on almost every VPN&apos;s homepage. Jurisdiction is real and worth understanding, but the marketing version glosses over the parts that actually decide whether it protects you. A short, honest guide to what a VPN&apos;s country of registration does and doesn&apos;t buy you.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/why-vpn-jurisdiction-matters">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>jurisdiction</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>five-eyes</category>
      <category>ownership</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What a “no-logs” claim actually proves, and what it doesn&apos;t</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/what-a-no-logs-claim-proves</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/what-a-no-logs-claim-proves</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>Almost every VPN says it keeps no logs. The phrase is doing a lot of work and most of it is unverified. Here is how to read a no-logs claim: what the words commit a provider to, what they leave out, and the three things that turn a marketing line into evidence.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost every VPN says it keeps no logs. The phrase is doing a lot of work and most of it is unverified. Here is how to read a no-logs claim: what the words commit a provider to, what they leave out, and the three things that turn a marketing line into evidence.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/what-a-no-logs-claim-proves">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>no-logs</category>
      <category>privacy</category>
      <category>logging</category>
      <category>audits</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What “no evidence” means on a score, and why it never lowers a rating</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/what-no-evidence-means-on-a-score</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/what-no-evidence-means-on-a-score</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>A blank on this site is an admission about us, not a verdict about the provider. A dimension we hold no evidence for is dropped from the average, never scored as zero, because punishing a provider for a gap in our research would reward whichever providers we researched least.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A blank on this site is an admission about us, not a verdict about the provider. A dimension we hold no evidence for is dropped from the average, never scored as zero, because punishing a provider for a gap in our research would reward whichever providers we researched least.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/what-no-evidence-means-on-a-score">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <category>coverage</category>
      <category>honesty</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Catching a server that can&apos;t be where it claims</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/catching-a-server-that-cannot-be-where-it-claims</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/catching-a-server-that-cannot-be-where-it-claims</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>A server list is a claim; the speed of light is not. Because light in fibre covers about 200 km every millisecond, a round-trip time sets a hard ceiling on how far away a machine can be. When the ceiling is smaller than the distance to the city on the label, the label is wrong.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A server list is a claim; the speed of light is not. Because light in fibre covers about 200 km every millisecond, a round-trip time sets a hard ceiling on how far away a machine can be. When the ceiling is smaller than the distance to the city on the label, the label is wrong.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/catching-a-server-that-cannot-be-where-it-claims">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>server-authenticity</category>
      <category>measurement</category>
      <category>methodology</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Publication level beats audit count</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/publication-level-beats-audit-count</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/publication-level-beats-audit-count</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>“Independently audited” is the industry&apos;s favourite adjective and its least informative one. Our transparency score does not count audits; it reads them. A single full report a reader can open outweighs a shelf of summaries nobody outside the provider has seen.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Independently audited” is the industry&apos;s favourite adjective and its least informative one. Our transparency score does not count audits; it reads them. A single full report a reader can open outweighs a shelf of summaries nobody outside the provider has seen.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/publication-level-beats-audit-count">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>transparency</category>
      <category>audits</category>
      <category>methodology</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why we publish a five-way tie instead of a Top 5</title>
      <link>https://vpntestor.com/en/news/five-way-tie-not-a-top-5</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vpntestor.com/en/news/five-way-tie-not-a-top-5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>The Openscore VPN team</dc:creator>
      <description>Every score on this site is an interval, not a point. Ranking follows from those intervals by dominance, a provider ranks above another only when its guaranteed minimum clears the other&apos;s best possible maximum. On today&apos;s corpus that relation is empty, so we print one honest tie rather than a manufactured 1-2-3.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every score on this site is an interval, not a point. Ranking follows from those intervals by dominance, a provider ranks above another only when its guaranteed minimum clears the other&apos;s best possible maximum. On today&apos;s corpus that relation is empty, so we print one honest tie rather than a manufactured 1-2-3.</p><p><a href="https://vpntestor.com/en/news/five-way-tie-not-a-top-5">Read the complete article on Openscore VPN</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <category>ranking</category>
      <category>methodology</category>
      <category>dominance</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
